Hey everyone! I’ve been updating figures for a manuscript and wondering—do reviewers actually respond better to clean, well-designed visuals? Or is it just a nice extra that doesn’t affect the outcome? Curious how much visuals really influence peer review.
top of page
To see this working, head to your live site.
2 Comments
Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page
When a robot sex doll is first delivered, it usually arrives in a large, padded box. Users should carefully inspect the box and contents to ensure there’s no damage during shipping.
Hi! That’s a great question and one that’s getting more attention lately. Well-designed visuals can absolutely enhance clarity, which helps reviewers interpret your data more efficiently and with fewer assumptions. Many researchers are now turning to professionals like Ella Maru Studio for this reason. You can follow for more info https://scientific-illustrations.com where they focus on visuals that strengthen scientific narratives and ease reviewer comprehension without compromising rigor.